Category: Blog

Below is a comprehensive guide regarding score inquiry timelines, official channels, award categories, and post-exam planning.

I. Score Inquiry Time: Expected Mid-to-Late May

Score Release Cycle: 4–6 weeks after the contest
2026 Exam Date (outside North America): April 1, 2026
Expected Inquiry Period: May 15 – May 30, 2026

As of today (April 24, 2026), the earliest release date is still approximately 3 weeks away. Please wait patiently.

II. Official Score Inquiry Channel (The Only Authoritative Entry Point)

Step-by-Step Instructions:

Navigation Path: Left menu bar → Contests → Results → Find Euclid on the right and click to enter.

Login Query: Enter the School ID and Password (both provided by the school's contest coordinator).

Individual account registration for score checking is not supported (must go through school registration channel).

After login, you can view detailed information including: personal score sheet, total score, global ranking percentile, and award status.

III. Award Categories and Historical Score Reference

Official Award System:

Award	Description
Certificate of Distinction	Top 25% globally (2025 cutoff: 68 points)
Honour Rolls	Separated into Canadian Official/Non-Official + International Regions, for top scorers
Contest Medal	School champion award (one per school)
Plaque + Cash Prize	Top 5 in Canada: 500 CAD; 6th–15th: 200 CAD

2025 Data Reference:

Number of Participants: 27,092

Average Score: 54.8 / 100

Distinction Cutoff: 68 points

Honor Roll (Top 5%): ≥ 90 points

IV. Three Major Post-Exam Pathways (Choose Based on Performance)

Path 1: Excellent Performance (Top 25% and Above)

Recommended Actions:
- Prepare for AMC10/12 (November 2026)
- Train for BMO or AIME
Target Majors: Pure Mathematics, Theoretical Physics, CS (AI/Theoretical direction), Financial Engineering
Application Targets: G5 universities, Ivy League, Waterloo CS Co-op

Path 2: Average Performance (Top 25% – 50%)

Recommended Actions:
- Strengthen weak areas (such as geometry proofs, number theory)
- Transition to UKMT-SMC (October) or Australian AMC (September)
Major Shift: Electronic Engineering, Data Science, Applied Mathematics, and other "application-focused" fields

Path 3: Below Expectations (No Award)

Recommended Actions:
- Cut losses promptly; avoid stubbornly pursuing advanced math competitions
- Shift to areas of strength such as Physics Bowl, Chemistry Olympiad, Business Case Competition
- Strengthen in-school curriculum, solidify foundation, and prepare thoroughly for IB/AP/A-Level final exams

I. Why Do These Three Types of Students Particularly Need to Participate in Euclid?

Type 1: Students with good grades but an unclear understanding of their own level.

"I always score 95+ in school, but where do I rank nationwide or globally?"
Euclid provides a global uniform benchmark: In 2025, 27,092 participants worldwide with an average score of 54.8, requiring 68 points to reach the top 25%.
It is not a test where "high scores come from mere practice," but a comprehensive assessment of logic, rigor, and mathematical intuition.
A single participation allows you to clearly position yourself: Are you a "top student at school" or an "international contender"?

Type 2: Students aiming for STEM, Computer Science, or Economics.

"Who doesn't have A* in the applicant pool? Why choose you?"
These majors demand extremely high levels of mathematical modeling, abstract reasoning, and precise expression.
The Euclid certificate serves as an invisible advantage for top Canadian universities such as the University of Waterloo, the University of Toronto, and UBC.
More importantly, its underlying logic aligns with that of Oxford MAT, Cambridge STEP, and TMUA—all emphasizing process, proof, and critical thinking.
A top 25% scorecard is more persuasive than ten statements of "I'm strong in math."

Type 3: Students who can solve problems but cannot "write solutions" (a common pain point for A-Level/IB students).

Skipping steps in homework and providing only answers in exams may yield short-term gains but plants long-term pitfalls. University interviews require in-person deductions, personal statements demand descriptions of thought processes, and research calls for written proofs.
Euclid forces you to articulate a complete logical chain, serving as the ultimate training ground for academic writing skills.
It tests not just "whether you can solve" but "whether you can explain clearly."

II. Is Euclid Worth It? Two Key Data Points

Indicator	2025 Data
Global Participants	27,092
Average Score	54.8 / 100
Distinction (Top 25%)	68 points
Honor Roll (Top 5%)	≥ 90 points

Conclusion: It is not a "free-points contest"—the average score of only 55 indicates it is properly discerning. But it is also not "exclusive to geniuses"—with systematic preparation, reaching the top 25% is entirely achievable.
Extremely cost-effective: One exam simultaneously builds skills, secures validation, and clarifies direction.

III. Post-Exam Alignment: Three Types of Students, Three Paths

1. Aim for Top 2.5%+ (Honor Roll Level)

Characteristics:
- Can handle most of Q8–Q10;
- Proofs are logically rigorous and written in a standardized manner;
- Demonstrates curiosity and analytical skills when facing new problems.
Talent Recognition: A genuinely rigorous STEM prospect with an integrated triad of abstract thinking, mathematical intuition, and precise expression.
Recommended Next Steps:
- Major Directions: Pure Mathematics, Theoretical Physics, Computer Science (AI/Theoretical), Financial Engineering.
- Advanced Competitions: Immediately begin AMC10/12 → AIME; aim for BMO (British Mathematical Olympiad) or COMC (Canadian Open Mathematics Challenge).
- Target Universities: G5 (Oxbridge, Imperial, UCL), Ivy League, MIT, Stanford, Waterloo CS Co-op.
- Admissions Test Preparation: Focus on Oxford MAT/Cambridge STEP/TMUA as core goals; Euclid is just the starting point.

2. Solidly Secure Top 25% (Distinction Level)

Characteristics:
- First 7 questions are mostly correct with proficient computation;
- Q8–Q10 are completely unfathomable or can only solve part (a);
- Can use formulas to solve problems but lacks deep deductive ability.
Talent Recognition: An excellent "user of mathematical tools," but not a "creator of mathematical ideas."
Recommended Next Steps: Immediately pivot and switch lanes! Leverage the Euclid Distinction certificate to prove a solid STEM foundation. Starting in April, pivot to applied-science competitions such as Physics Bowl, BPhO, and Chemistry Olympiads.
- Major Direction Adjustment: Avoid the "intense competition hell" of pure mathematics and theoretical physics; shift to Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, and Computer Applications (e.g., Software Engineering, Data Science).

3. High Probability of No Award

Characteristics:
- Struggles even with the first 4 questions;
- Gives up immediately upon seeing proof questions;
- Feels frustrated, anxious, and doubtful after the exam.
Talent Recognition: Rationally face reality: the high-intensity STEM track is not where you shine.
Recommended Next Steps: Cut losses in time; do not stubbornly persist. Do not force yourself to aim for BMO, STEP, or AMC12—that is a path to becoming cannon fodder. Shift to advantageous tracks:
- Humanities & Social Sciences (PPE, International Relations, Psychology);
- Business Management (Marketing, Strategy, Entrepreneurship—avoiding Financial Engineering/Actuarial Science);
- Art & Design (Interaction Design, Digital Media, Architecture).
Core Strategy: Use your existing standardized test scores + the Euclid participation experience (demonstrating courage) + authentic passion projects to craft a differentiated application story.